time server will not be used, if you use NTPIdeally it should be based on trigger eg. DHCP renew, interface up, time server should stick to ntp client with default configuration enabled and pointed to public pool
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
If your router sits behind NAT and does not get a public IP, then you would never have access to it anyway without the NAT router providing port forwards to you.GR8 Feature.
But What about NAT Networks, how we could get Ddns.
DNS resolves to the public router, connection is made to this IP, 1:1 NAT should work on your gateway, if you want to redirect these requests to some internal machine.The question evidently was about 1:1 nat where all ports are redirected to the router's wan behind other nat. Therefore the wan is not equipped with public IP. Does it work in this case?
of course you can still use DDNS scripts. But in this case, you only need to set one setting. No registration, no maintenance, no scripting.Thus, not interesting for me so far. My ddns scripts work reliably in all cases...
[me@myrouter] > ping 30xxxxxxxxxxx.sn.mynetname.net
HOST SIZE TTL TIME STATUS
192.168.1.91 56 64 0ms
192.168.1.91 56 64 0ms
192.168.1.91 56 64 0ms
192.168.1.91 56 64 0ms
192.168.1.91 56 64 0ms
sent=5 received=5 packet-loss=0% min-rtt=0ms avg-rtt=0ms max-rtt=0ms
1) It kind'a does AFAIK... I mean, there's a warning if the public IP detected is different than the one the router sends. The "warning" is in the form of a status message.Still I do not uderstand how Mikrotik could release such stupid thing:
1) It does not recognize the internal ip range (defined by RFC)! There should be check in order to prevent local IP registrations.
2) It writes something as message in the left side of statusbar:
" DDNS server received request from IP 8...". Dammed, why it is cut?? Why it is impossible to see the status message?
3) It gives terrible domain name. I would like to meet some people that will be able to write this address into the browser from memory when they are woken up in the middle of the night. If it is aimed at "home users" than this is not an advance for them.
4) No multiple wans handling.
5) Not working in case of 1:1 nat or dmz. Many of home users do not have public ip on their wan ports, but somehow natted, if ISP allowed this.
Why mikrotik did not get inspiration from DDNS agents in OpenWRT or from TP-Link routers? There is possible to drill-down the list of DDNS providers and fill simple few fields with username, domain and passowrd and it is? Mikrotik could select few mostly used DDNS service providers, create scripts, prepare the user interface cockpit for it and it would be much better. Of course, there could be added option to simply register, or to use mikrotiks own service, but in some user-friendly way. And adding new and new DDNS providers as users repot them. This could be helpful.
Really, really it looks very unprofessional. I am disappointed that (according to my oppinion) so highly valuated development team of mikrotik did something like this.
I can tell you from personal experience that it's VERY difficult to ask from an end user to register any sort of an account for anything, particularly when they can't wrap their head around why it's necessary when they aren't going to be manipulating a thing themselves (but instead let a machine do it for them). The logic goes that if something is publically visible, and you're only setting it up once, it shouldn't require an account, but just a one time request & approval process at worst... It takes some deep mental processing power for end users to figure out that a machine is doing something that they must otherwise do manually themselves (and thus they need to identify themselves, and not the device), and that the device needs a username and password in order to work on their behalf.Why mikrotik did not get inspiration from DDNS agents in OpenWRT or from TP-Link routers? There is possible to drill-down the list of DDNS providers and fill simple few fields with username, domain and passowrd and it is?
3) It gives terrible domain name. I would like to meet some people that will be able to write this address into the browser from memory when they are woken up in the middle of the night. If it is aimed at "home users" than this is not an advance for them.
But for some users (particularly professionals; home users don't care I guess) it matters whether they're accessing the router over one WAN or another (e.g. if they're diagnosing connection problems), so there should be a way to explicitly target one.As for multiple WANs - if both public IP addresses work, the feature will work. It will resolve to one of them, and the end goal is reached, you can access your router.
/ip cloud set nat-traversal=yes
It means that DNS name will work only for routers that have Public IP addressi have error
DDNS service might not work
It would be very very nice if we could choose between the two options. With it, the IP Cloud feature will become more useful.we could offer a choice, to send the detected public IP or the detected local IP. Then you could set 1:1 NAT on the gateway if you have access to it.
It is only for RouterBOARD devicesI don't see the IP Cloud feature on my x86 v6.15.
... for now... hopefully?It is only for RouterBOARD devicesI don't see the IP Cloud feature on my x86 v6.15.
This would be a very nice feature. Our router is in the DMZ and have the 192.168.1.2 address (detected ip is in the 188.142.x.x range), so the function is unuseable now because the dns system give back to local ip.we could offer a choice, to send the detected public IP or the detected local IP. Then you could set 1:1 NAT on the gateway if you have access to it.
ABSOLUTELY a must have.we could offer a choice, to send the detected public IP or the detected local IP. Then you could set 1:1 NAT on the gateway if you have access to it.
this is already available in the 6.16rc18 (via CLI interface)
ABSOLUTELY a must have.
Due to the use of Fios or the need to keep Xfinity Voip/Modem/Routers inline... many companies I work with are in the DMZ. If there were someway to tell the system to use the actual WAN IP that would make it usable for a lot more home users.
Many home users and AV integrators would really appreciate if we could finally have a winbox option to enter our credentials for dyndns.
Peronally, I lean heavily on my dyndns updater script.
Aaa....would somebody mind to instruct me to access the mt router using cloud ip....???
normisIt is only for RouterBOARD devicesI don't see the IP Cloud feature on my x86 v6.15.
I thing from version 6.13 but use latest version 6.17 if your router don't have public address, because in 6.16/6.17 can use external address for update.
what ros version this IP cloud features?
thanks
the ip doesn't change after power loss even it shows it is updated with the previous ip and won't update with the new ip until I force update by myselfit will refresh when router is starting up. (at least it should and our testing has showed that it does)
Can you tell us what you did and how IP information was not updated properly on router booting up?
/ip cloud force-update
Of course but what is reliably today, no-ip before couple weeks not working almost one week, other service what I am using not have possibility to change TTL, IP cloud is almost perfect scheduler resolve bug .Or use normal dynamic dns service that works reliably as you want...
thanks, we will make this work in the next routeros versionBuzz your are right IP Cloud have bug if you behind NAT not update IP address because not see address is changed, I all ready write support but no answer they say update every minutes but it is not true they update on change but if router behind NAT not see change and not update must click force update. Have couple router with IP cloud with external address and nat they all perform the some.
Because of that to make IP cloud use behind NAT put
Code: Select all/ip cloud force-update
in scheduler I put interval 3 minutes and working perfect.
If router have external address it is ok.
Thanks, but the issue is very clear. If RouterOS doesn't see any IP changes, it doesn't do the update. It doesn't know that the ISP changed the IP on their router. We will make an option to send force update every x minutes, if outgoing address is set to be used.Thanks very much.
If you need more information I send it you supout.rif before almost two weeks 30.6 with that problem Ticket#2014073066000442.
many thanks , that is what I was looking for , and u r right my routerboard is behind natBuzz your are right IP Cloud have bug if you behind NAT not update IP address because not see address is changed, I all ready write support but no answer they say update every minutes but it is not true they update on change but if router behind NAT not see change and not update must click force update. Have couple router with IP cloud with external address and nat they all perform the some.
Because of that to make IP cloud use behind NAT put
Code: Select all/ip cloud force-update
in scheduler I put interval 3 minutes and working perfect.
If router have external address it is ok.
For what is this? How can we know what to put on the "ddnslastipINTx"?Author not me, but it work on my MT for two interfaces.
For it I change ddnslastipINT0 to ddnslastipINT1 or ddnslastipINT2 etc.
Here is it screen shoot.Hi buzz!
Can you show us the screenshot or configuration of the schedule for Cloud IP?
I think my cloud IP is not updating.
sorry for my delayed replyHi buzz!
Can you show us the screenshot or configuration of the schedule for Cloud IP?
I think my cloud IP is not updating.
3) It gives terrible domain name. I would like to meet some people that will be able to write this address into the browser from memory when they are woken up in the middle of the night. If it is aimed at "home users" than this is not an advance for them.
Easy solution:
CNAME: mikrotik.mydomain.com -> 1234567890.sn.mynetname.net
and then? What can I do?Because of cached dns records. Probably.
Hi,note: RB is CC1036 12 4s and OS ver: 6.5
and then? What can I do?Because of cached dns records. Probably.
I already have a public ip and I do not need this (excellent) service. How can I disable it and delete the URL XXX.sn.mynetname.net? Right now it is still accessible though the option is disabled!
We had a service disruption. It is fixed now.Our customers can not see the camera out there, there must DNS Server MikroTik is faulty ?
Of course that will work, but you need to add a NAT rule to point to your NAS also.Hello,
Do you know if this option works with Synology server ?
Thank you
Hello and thank you for your answerOf course that will work, but you need to add a NAT rule to point to your NAS also.
1. Set static IP for NAS.Hello and thank you for your answerOf course that will work, but you need to add a NAT rule to point to your NAS also.
Do you know where this goes NAT rule?
My server is plugged into the ether 3 Port
I grieve not know but networks
Thank you in advance
Claude
if you have your own DNS, you can use router FQDN as a CNAME entry and configure your services to reply to your proper name and ignore the rest.How-to change dns name my mikrotik? It's need for secure access. Dns name my mikrotik has been know other people. Very need help!
I'm pretty sure that (W)ISPs are not target audience for cloud DNS, minority among home users are. Minority that is exposing some (small) part of home computing resources to internet (if only to have remote administration) and are doomed with being forced to use dynamic IP address. Or blessed, depends on what perspective you take. I guess quite a few of those don't have possibility to create a less cryptic DNS alias as not many home users have DNS (sub)domain at their disposal.Janisk, we, who have our own dns, do not use your ip cloud service at all. Happily.