Hi all,
I'm with a problem in some queues. I don't know the reason but some clients can have more bandwith that the configurated for them.
The client that have the IP 200.yyy.xxx.226 has more bandwidth during all time. The configuration of the simple queue is listed below:
name="JOSE DA SILVA" target-addresses=200.yyy.xxx.226/32 dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 interface=all parent=none direction=both priority=8 queue=default/default limit-at=32000/200000 max-limit=32000/200000 total-queue=default
How you can see the maximum upload is 32kbps and the maximum download is 200kbps, but the client can do downloads approximately 400kbps and the upload is always around of 50kbps constantly.
Has somebody any idea of why this happen?
PS: The type of default queue is bfifo now but I tested pfifo and red types.
Thanks in advance.
here is a config , for a simple queue from my MT box , this works vell at all.
hope this will help u.
Code: Select all
name="PC05" target-addresses=0.0.0.0/0 dst-adress=aa.1b.0.cc/32 interface=all parent=none priority=8 queue=ethernet-default/default limit-at=90000/90000 max-limit=90000/90000 total-queue=default -
-
conchalnet
Member Candidate
- Posts: 274
- Joined:
- Location: Brazil
Hi
This is one from my simple queues :
add name="User 257" target-addresses=192.168.4.209/32 \
dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 interface=all parent=none direction=both priority=8 \
queue=default/default limit-at=32000/128000 max-limit=256000/512000 \
burst-limit=256000/768000 burst-threshold=128000/384000 burst-time=5s/20s \
total-queue=default disabled=no
Never had problems with overloaded queues.
This is one from my simple queues :
add name="User 257" target-addresses=192.168.4.209/32 \
dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 interface=all parent=none direction=both priority=8 \
queue=default/default limit-at=32000/128000 max-limit=256000/512000 \
burst-limit=256000/768000 burst-threshold=128000/384000 burst-time=5s/20s \
total-queue=default disabled=no
Never had problems with overloaded queues.
-
-
conchalnet
Member Candidate
- Posts: 274
- Joined:
- Location: Brazil
-
-
conchalnet
Member Candidate
- Posts: 274
- Joined:
- Location: Brazil
too little information. Im using connection limit, p2p blocking and queue tree with services packet marking. All working fine. Im remember some problem with overloaded simple queues with old 2.8.26? mt version... Mabe its problem with lack of parameters in your queues? Did you try use burst limit parameters? (i mean max, threshold and time)
-
-
conchalnet
Member Candidate
- Posts: 274
- Joined:
- Location: Brazil
-
-
conchalnet
Member Candidate
- Posts: 274
- Joined:
- Location: Brazil
Im not sure. Im using, and discovering MT from 1,5 year. Using simple queues as you saw my example almost from begin (burst limit = max limit) Its working. Maybe burst limits are not required. I dont want try change this. Too many users in my network (about 600) and it will be too risky. Hope someone else with bigger MT knowledge can help you more.
-
-
conchalnet
Member Candidate
- Posts: 274
- Joined:
- Location: Brazil
Two thinks :
1. Maybe not all of your users using the same communication methods (as flashget download, p2p programs, p2m etc.) and it looks as queues works for almos all except few peoples.
2. Change one bad working queue and watch what will be isnt not much work i think so.
(about changing lot of queues, im doing it too sometimes. I using script with "for" mt command)
1. Maybe not all of your users using the same communication methods (as flashget download, p2p programs, p2m etc.) and it looks as queues works for almos all except few peoples.
2. Change one bad working queue and watch what will be isnt not much work i think so.
(about changing lot of queues, im doing it too sometimes. I using script with "for" mt command)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: F3BOli, GoogleOther [Bot] and 38 guests